logo

Constructing the New York State-Local Internet Gateway Prototype: A Technical View

Abstract

Introduction

Prototype Design and Components

Participants

Methodology and Timeline

Architecture and Infrastructure

Data Sources and Limitations

Application Scope Statements, Role Designations, and Functional and Data Requirements

Prototyping Lessons Learned

Limitations of the Prototype Compared to a Production System

Conclusion

Appendices

Appendices


Appendix 1. Prototype Team Members and Corporate Partners


State Government
Mary Lou Acheson, Senior Computer Operator, NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets
Patricia Arthur, Clerk, NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets
Colleen Benson, Real Property Analyst, NYS Office of Real Property Services
Roberta Brooks, Principal Clerk, Companion Animal Unit, NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets
Sally Cooney, Real Property Analyst, NYS Office of Real Property Services
Joan Darcy, Associate Programmer, Division of Information Systems, NYS Office of the State Comptroller
Carole Francis, Statewide Applied Technology Advisor, NYS Office of the State Comptroller
Michele Hasso, Manager, MACROS Strategic Services, NYS Office of the State Comptroller
Jeffry Huse, Assistant Director, Division of Animal Industry, NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets
Tom Rutnik, Associate Computer Programmer Analyst, NYS Office of Real Property Services
Bruce Sauter, Chief Information Officer and Chief Valuation Strategist, NYS Office of Real Property Services
Wendy Scheening, Manager, Information Systems, NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets
Gregory Smith, Chief Information Officer, Division of Local Government Services, NYS Office of the State Comptroller

County Government
Tim Bortree, Chief Information Officer, Monroe County
Barbara Fiala, County Clerk, Broome County
Ed Hemminger, Chief Information Officer, Ontario County
Robert Lilly, Information Technology Director (retired), Essex County
Kim McKinney, Chief Information Officer, Broome County
Susan Pufky, Assistant Director, Real Property Tax Service, Broome County

Municipal Government
Richard Brown, Director of Development and Planning, City of Canandaigua
Carolee Conklin, City Clerk, City of Rochester
Diane Conroy-LaCivita, Deputy Town Clerk, Town of Colonie
Bonnie Drake, Town Clerk, Town of Canadice
John McDonald, Assessor, Town of Union
Anne McPherson, Deputy City Clerk, City of White Plains
Michelle Mosher, Town Clerk, Town of Gardiner
Kathleen Newkirk, Town Clerk, Town of Bethlehem
Laura Kay Wharmby, City Clerk, City of Canandaigua
Judy Zurenda, Town Clerk, Town of Binghamton

Corporate Partners

AT&T Corporation
Karen Prescott, Data Sales and IP Specialist

CGI Information Systems and Management Consultants, Inc.
Ashish Advani, Consultant
Duane Benson, Technical Architect
William Cunningham, Business Development Director
Lorna Ganong, Director of Consulting Services
Ed McGinley, Consultant
Anish Mody, Consultant
Afzal Mohammed, Senior Consultant
Brian Peek, Senior Consultant
Mandy Prezioso, Senior Consultant

Keane, Inc.
Bob Bush, Senior Consultant
Christopher Desany, Technical Architect
Joann Dunham, NYS Program Manager
Teresa Gillooley, Project Officer

Microsoft Corporation
Bill Branch, Client Executive, NYS

Center for Technology in Government
Meghan Cook, Program Manager
James Costello, Lead Programmer Analyst
Sharon Dawes, Center Director
Dubravka Juraga, Program Associate
Christina Pagano, Program Associate
Benjamin Schwartz, Graduate Assistant
Derek Werthmuller, Director of Technology Services

Appendix 2. Call for Corporate Partners

CTG logo

University at Albany / SUNY

April 7, 2003
Invitation for Corporate Partnership

The Center for Technology in Government (CTG) is seeking Corporate Partners to participate in a project that will build, test, and evaluate a State–Local Internet Gateway prototype. The prototype will use Internet technologies to channel three separate government to government (G2G) business processes involving state agencies and a number of local governments through one common access point. The purpose of the Gateway is to test and evaluate mechanisms for G2G business relationships including selected communications, reference services, information exchanges, and business transactions among state and local government organizations in New York.

Corporate partners bring technical and other expertise to CTG projects by loaning or donating hardware, software, communications technologies, or professional services to the Center. For this project we expect most development work will take place in Albany and be completed during Summer 2003. A field test and evaluation will deploy the prototype around the state and take place in Fall 2003. Please review the detailed information about the project on our web site at www.ctg.albany.edu/projects/lg2/lg2desc.html. Please also review our policies regarding New York State projects and corporate participation at www.ctg.albany.edu/aboutctg/op_pol.html.

The Gateway prototype will be designed to test whether a portal providing access to information and services will offer state, county, and municipal governments greater efficiency, high quality authentic data, and more consistent and coordinated services. It will also help identify the policies, infrastructure, and applications necessary for doing business in this way.

The project consists of two phases. Phase One included the formation of an Advisory Committee and Prototype Teams of state and local governments. These groups defined information and transaction content to be included in the prototype and outlined a structure or architecture for the Gateway. This phase has been completed.

Phase Two of the project moves into prototype design and development, followed by limited state-wide testing and evaluation. The prototype development effort includes not only the overall portal, but also web versions of three different business processes from three different government domains. This phase of the project provides an opportunity for corporate partners to play a role in activities ranging from demonstrations of specific technologies, to involvement in business process and system analysis, as well as system design, development, and support activities. During Phase Two, we will also deploy the prototype in the field, and conduct a formal evaluation to identify the cost, management, policy, and technology factors related to doing business in this new way.

A mandatory informational meeting will be held for interested companies on April 28 at 1:00 PM in the Standish Room of the University at Albany Science Library. Directions may be found at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/projects/lg2/lg2directions.html. Those interested in participating in the project need to register for and attend the informational meeting. Please register by contacting CTG by email at slgateway@ctg.albany.edu or fax to (518) 442-3886 by 5:00 p.m. on April 23, 2003. Please include in your registration information your company name and address, name of contact person, phone number,

e-mail address and names of persons attending the meeting.

CTG will select a Corporate Partner(s) for this project in early May.

To obtain more information about the project, visit the CTG Web site at: www.ctg.albany.edu/projects/lg2/lg2desc.html

For information on CTG policies regarding corporate partnerships see

www.ctg.albany.edu/aboutctg/op_pol.html

The Center for Technology in Government is an applied research unit at the University at Albany/SUNY. CTG works with government to develop information strategies that foster innovation and enhance the quality and coordination of public services. The Center periodically seeks corporate partners to support our technology laboratory and projects through contributions or loans of hardware, software, and consulting services.

Appendix 3. CTG Project Policies


Characteristics of CTG's New York State Projects







Roles and Responsibilities of Partners in New York State Projects
All partners have important roles in the Center's program. The roles and responsibilities of project partners are briefly outlined below.

State and local government and nonprofit agencies Corporate contributors University faculty NYS Forum for Information Resource Management The Center

Criteria for Corporate Partner Participation in New York State Projects
Information technology vendors and other corporate partners are an integral part of many Center projects. Whenever a project could be furthered by the participation of private sector participants, CTG reaches out to the corporate community to invite involvement. This is typically done by posting a call for corporate partners notice in the State Contract Reporter and by sending direct mailings to companies in our database. This is usually followed by an open informational meeting and then by discussions with companies which offer to participate.

CTG staff members review all corporate proposals for individual projects and select proposals that best support the specific project objectives and meet the following general requirements:

CTG preferences for corporate involvement
Although not required, the Center gives preference to the following situations:

Relationship between the CTG and the New York State procurement process
Center projects involve the study, use, prototyping, and demonstration of new and emerging information technologies that are of interest to government. These technologies represent tools for crafting new services and for improving the productivity of government operations. The hands-on experience and documented results of Center projects will greatly increase the amount and availability of reliable empirical information about these technologies.

Any agency may participate in any Center project, with one exception. No agency that has an open RFP for a technology solution that is the subject of a Center project may be a member of that particular project team. No project will be undertaken by the Center unless government agency staff members are also committed to work directly on the project. This requirement ensures that participating agencies have a strong interest in the technology and a reasonable expectation that the technology can be applied to a real business problem.

Although there is no connection between any particular Center project and any particular procurement, the information generated by projects can improve the technology procurement process in the following ways: The productivity value of technology solutions demonstrated in the Center will strengthen agency proposals for purposes of internal review and oversight processes where cost savings, cost avoidance, quality improvements, and productivity enhancements are important evaluation criteria.

Staff relationships with corporate partners
CTG staff, (including regular and temporary professional staff, support staff, Research Foundation staff, faculty, and students) all come in frequent contact with companies that are current or potential CTG Corporate Partners. The relationships that staff establish with these companies will affect the success of CTG as an organization in several respects: Our policy regarding corporate relationships is as follows:

Appendix 4. Dog Licensing Application Process Map

Click anywhere on image to view larger version.

Dog Licensing Application Process Map

Appendix 5. Contact Directory and Repository Application Process Map

Click anywhere on images to view larger versions.

The Optimal and Ideal Process for Access to the Repository

The Ideal Process for Updating the Contact Repository

Appendix 6. Parcel Transfer Verification Check Application Process Map

Click anywhere on image to view larger version.

Parcel Transfer Verification Check Application Process Map