Projects
Creating an Enterprise IT Governance Framework for New York State Government
The purpose of this project was to generate a set of
recommendations for enterprise IT governance in NYS
government. The recommendations are based on a
framework that was collaboratively developed with key
stakeholders within NYS, including state CIOs, state control
agencies, and the Office of the Chief Information Officer and
Office for Technology (CIO/OFT).
The April/May 2009 issue of Public CIO magazine, featured an
article by Theresa Pardo, director, and Jana Hrdinová, program
associate, on IT governance in the context of state government.
Couture Governance focused on the challenges faced by state
CIOs in implementing new IT governance structures that allow for
coordinated action across organizations’ boundaries.
Key challenges highlighted in the final
report are the lack
of clarity of roles and responsibilities and the absence of
adequate checks and balances. The governance structure
recommended in the report includes several oversight
bodies that clarify the locations for decision making and
information sharing. A structure based on checks and
balances is suggested to allow all stakeholders to have an
appropriate role in the process. This structure has a
workable arrangement of roles and responsibilities to resolve
many of the current issues of authority and enterprise
identity in New York State.
Project Page >>
CTG Testifies at New York State Assembly
Hearing on State IT Governance and Procurement
The New York State Assembly Standing Committee
on Governmental Operations held a hearing on
November 10, 2009 to examine New York’s
information technology structures regarding
purchasing and managing technology products and
services. CTG deputy director, Anthony Cresswell,
presented testimony based on lessons learned
from CTG’s IT Governance project. In the
testimony, Cresswell pointed to the project report
recommendations for a structure that clarifies roles
and responsibilities in resolving issues of enterprise
boundaries and that sets responsibility for sorting
issues and strategy questions to the appropriate venue.
“Both the Office for Technology and UAlbany’s Center for Technology in Government have come forward in the past
year with well-researched and well-reasoned governance models for New York State, and I commend both bodies
for their significant contributions to our understanding of how the State can improve technology policy and decisionmaking,
resulting in improved services and financial savings. It is important that we follow the advice of both of the
reports and ensure that centralization does not become command-and-control, but rather collaborate and listen.
Most importantly, it is clear to me is that there is an imperative need to formalize New York’s IT Governance structure.”
—Assemblywoman RoAnn Destito, Chair, New York State Assembly Committee on Governmental Operations
Exploring the Use of Social Media in Government
Over 60 New York state and local government professionals
attended two CTG workshops to share their insights on the
value they seek in their use of social media, as well as their most
pressing questions and concerns. Pictured is M oses Kamya, CIO
of NYS Governor’s Office of Employee Relations.
Over the last several years, the emergence of social media
has offered the possibility of transforming the way
government agencies communicate and cooperate not only
among themselves, but also with the public. Although the
potential benefits of social media use by government
agencies are considerable, the number of issues connected
with such use and the number of potential pitfalls are
substantial as well. Agencies are looking for guidance on
how to achieve a balance in their use of social media.
In 2009, CTG released a
report identifying the benefits
and concerns surrounding the use of social media in
government. The report was based on two workshops
facilitated by CTG to collect input from government
professionals in NYS. In 2010, CTG will conduct interviews
with professionals from different levels of government to
provide practical examples of how agencies manage social
media use. Based on this information, CTG will produce a
guide that offers practical advice on policy and regulatory
issues associated with the use of social media by
government agencies, guidance on resolving some of the
most pressing concerns identified, and suggestions on tools
that can help agencies efficiently achieve their organizational
objectives through social media.
Project Page >>
Leveraging Technology for ARRA Reporting: A Best
Practices and Knowledge Sharing Forum
From left to right: Scott Edwards and Richard Umholtz, NYS
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Philip Bell, NYS
Department of Transportation, and Robert Martin, NYS Division of
Military and Navel Affairs participated in a panel at CTG’s second
ARRA forum to share lessons learned while meeting the October
2009 reporting requirement.
CTG, with the support of Governor Paterson’s Economic
Recovery and Reinvestment Cabinet, initiated a series of
forums for NYS agencies to share best practices on effective
technology-based American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) reporting strategies. The goal of the forums is to
support the exchange of information about reporting and to
leverage existing best and current practices in this area.
The federal requirements for reporting on the use of
ARRA funds rely on the ability of state agencies to leverage
current and new technology resources to capture, manage,
and deliver the necessary data. This mandate provides an
opportunity for cross-agency knowledge sharing on effective
technology-based reporting and public dissemination
strategies.
In 2009, CTG hosted two of these forums. The
first forum
included a presentation by the NYS Department of
Transportation on information technology solutions
developed to manage ARRA reporting leading up to first
reporting deadline on October 10, 2009. At the
second
forum, CTG moderated two panels of representatives from a
diverse cross section of six state agencies. The first panel
shared their experiences from the October 10, 2009 ARRA
reporting process. The second panel focused on the issues
and challenges related to subrecipient reporting. CTG will
host one additional forum in 2010 and then prepare a
lessons learned report.
Project Page >>
Mitigating Cross-Border Air Pollution
The Air Policy Forum oversees the ten-year Border 2012
program, which takes a bottom-up, regional approach and
relies heavily on local input, decision making, priority setting,
and project implementation to best address environmental
issues in the US-Mexico border region. The program brings
together a wide variety of stakeholders to prioritize
sustainable actions that consider the environmental needs of
the different border communities. At the request of the US
and Mexican co-chairs of the Air Policy Forum, a team of
researchers from CTG and California State University,
Dominguez Hills developed a case study on the Joint
Advisory Committee (JAC) for Air Quality Improvement in the
Cuidad Juárez, Mexico/El Paso, Texas/Doña Ana County,
New Mexico Air Basin.
As part of the study, the research team traveled to El Paso,
Texas and La Cruces, New Mexico to meet with and interview
US and Mexican members of the JAC. The resulting case
study,
Mitigating Cross-Border Air Pollution: The Power
of A Network, focuses on how this collaboration between
two countries, three states, multiple levels of government,
and industry, government, and academic organizations was
formed and able to facilitate the improvement of air quality
in this particular US and Mexican border region.
Building a Sustainable International Digital Government
Research Community
This project is a multi-year effort to develop a sustainable
global community of digital government researchers and
research sponsors funded by the National Science
Foundation (NSF). It includes an international reconnaissance
study, an annual research institute, and a framework for
supporting three international working groups.
Working Groups
UAlbany’s President George M. Philip (center) welcomed
15 international scholars to a workshop hosted by CTG to gather
key members from all three international digital government
working groups to share their insights and expertise on
conducting international research and cultivating international
research partnerships.
For the past three years, three international working groups
have been exploring distinct areas of digital government,
which are evaluating the impacts of online citizen consultation
initiatives, developing a comparative and transnational digital
government research agenda for North America, and
developing a prototype geoinformatic hotspot surveillance
system. In 2009, CTG organized a workshop of key members
from all three groups to share insights and expertise on
conducting international research and cultivating international
research partnerships. Their insights and recommendations
for similar future efforts will be part of a report to NSF
and others on strategies for supporting future international
research relationships.
iGov Research Institute
iGov brings twenty doctoral students from around the world
together in a unique intensive residential program to evaluate
the impact of information and communication technologies
on the public sector and to understand the value of doing
research in an international and multi-cultural context. In
2009, the third annual Institute was held in Seattle, WA,
hosted by The Information School, University of Washington.
Doctoral students from around the world attended the 2009 iGov
Research Institute in Seattle, WA.
Students from Canada, China, Croatia, Denmark, France,
India, Lithuania, the Netherlands, the Philippines, Saudi
Arabia, Thailand, Turkey, and the United States attended,
representing multiple academic disciplines and 14 different
universities in the US, Europe, and Asia.
Throughout the week, students engaged with leading
scholars in the field. Lectures and in-depth discussionscovered cutting edge topical areas, methodologies, and
theories, as well as relating research to practice and sharing
first-hand experience in doing international research.
Students interacted directly with public and private sector
leaders through a series of field activities to several Seattle
city and nonprofit agencies and Microsoft’s headquarters.
Students also had the opportunity to present their own
developing research ideas and proposals to their peers and
faculty for feedback and discussion, and to participate in a
small group project on an international digital government
research question designed to explore ways to work in multidisciplinary
and multi-cultural research teams. These targeted
activities help iGov students develop personal and professional
relationships that will continue throughout their careers.
Reconnaissance Study
The reconnaissance study, initially completed in 2007, was
updated in 2009. It takes a broad look at the state of
international digital government (DG) research. International
DG research focuses on questions, topics, and problems
that are relevant beyond the borders of a single country or
culture. A set of 276 English-language articles, found in 40
journals, proceedings of thirteen conferences, and the Web
sites of twelve research-oriented organizations between
1994 and 2008 are categorized into six areas encompassing
various elements of international research: benchmark,
comparative, transnational, fundamental issue, regional, and
best practice studies. The report also highlights publishing
trends and research and topical patterns.
Project Page >>
North American Digital Government Working Group
CTG is co-chair of the North American Digital Government
Working Group (NADGWG), which was formed by
researchers and practitioners from a variety of institutions
and disciplines in Canada, the United States, and Mexico to
advance electronic government research across geographic
and political boundaries in the region. This group was
formed with the support of the National Science Foundation
Digital Government Research Program and the home
institutions of the members.
Members of the North American Digital Government Working Group
(NADGWG) met in Washington, DC to continue their work on the
development of a comparative transnational research agenda.
Together, the group is producing a series of deliverables
for academics and practitioners as they work to enhance
capability within multi-jurisdictional policy domains. The
working group members are developing a transnational
research agenda targeted at questions about
intergovernmental digital government initiatives in North
America. The diversity present in the three North American
countries enables the group to develop lessons not only for the region, but also for developing and developed countries
facing similar policy issues around the world.
NADGWG also includes two subgroups. The Border Region
subgroup is examining the issues and challenges facing
government organizations in the border regions of North
America in terms of information sharing and interoperability.
The Full Information Product Pricing (FIPP) project aims to
develop positive incentives for companies to produce worker
and environment friendly products in the NAFTA region.
Project Page >>
Modeling Interorganizational Information Integration
Integrating and sharing information in multi-organizational
government settings involves complex interactions within
social and technological contexts. Since 2002, through a
multi-year NSF grant, CTG has been developing and testing
dynamic models of information integration in these settings.
The research has concentrated on integration activities in
two critical policy areas—justice and public health—that
include a wide range of information sharing functions across
all three levels of government.
In 2009, CTG completed the final data collection phase of
the project and released a report summarizing the results of
a national survey of cross-boundary information (CBI) sharing
in the public sector. The model on which the survey is based
is a new theoretical representation of the individual and
organization-level factors that influence interorganizational
relationships and organizational change. That model was
developed through rigorous qualitative analysis of eight cases
of government cross-boundary information sharing using
grounded theory techniques. The resulting integrative model
shows how a diversity of factors interact and influence the success of cross-boundary information sharing efforts.
The national survey involved over 700 government
professionals from criminal justice and public health agencies
at the local and state levels from across the 50 states. The
survey data provide for examining how a consistent set of
factors interact to influence CBI initiatives. These
results
provide practitioners from around the world with important
knowledge about how to increase government’s
performance, accountability, and transparency. CTG will
continue to analyze project data to test the weight of each of
the factors as compared to their overall influence, and
making further results available in both academic and
practitioner publications.
Project Page >>
Analyzing the University at Albany’s Human Resource Processes
CTG worked with the University at Albany’s Division of
Finance and Business to help them better understand the
core processes and information flow among the
departments of Financial Management and Budget, Human
Resources Management (including Payroll and Benefits), and
the Office of Diversity and Affirmative Action.
Meghan Cook, program manager, facilitating a group exercise on
core processes and information flow with UAlbany departments of
Financial Management and Budget, Human Resources Management
and the Office of Diversity and Affirmative Action.
Through a series of facilitated workshops, individual
interviews, and document analysis, CTG developed a set of
process models defining the University’s appointment
process and set forth recommendations to move to a more
automated workflow. The value added from this work was a
detailed enterprise information flow for the University’s
critical human resource processes. This analysis was a
critical first step in understanding the current human
resources environment before strategic and tactical
investments are made.
For more information on current and past projects,
click here.
< Previous |
|
Next >